Home / Resources / Ontario's Licence Appeal Tribunal: Failing Accident Victims While Favouring Insurers
Personal Injury

Ontario's Licence Appeal Tribunal: Failing Accident Victims While Favouring Insurers

UL Lawyers Professional Corporation
August 23, 2025
10 min read

Ontario's Licence Appeal Tribunal: Failing Accident Victims While Favouring Insurers

Imagine surviving a serious car accident only to find out the system designed to help you is actually stacked against you. Unfortunately, that's the reality many Ontario accident victims face today. Over the past decade, provincial auto insurance reforms have slashed benefits, shortened support periods, and forced injured people into a frustrating claims tribunal that heavily favours insurance companies. The result? Innocent victims are left without the care and compensation they desperately need -- while insurance companies continue to profit.

Accident Benefits Slashed in 2016 -- Less Help When You Need It Most

Ontario once had one of the most generous accident benefit systems in Canada. Before June 1, 2016, if you suffered a catastrophic injury (life-altering trauma like severe brain damage or paralysis), you were entitled to up to $2 million in benefits -- $1 million for medical and rehabilitation expenses and another $1 million for attendant care. These funds could cover years of therapy, nursing, home modifications, and other vital supports. But after 2016, those benefits were cut in half -- a catastrophic reduction for catastrophically injured people.

Non-Catastrophic Injuries Hit Even Harder

For those with non-catastrophic injuries, the situation is also grim. Prior to 2016, accident victims could access up to $86,000 for medical/rehabilitation and attendant care benefits, and this support could extend up to 10 years. Today, that has been reduced to $65,000 total, and only for 5 years. Beyond that, the insurer's obligation ends -- even if treatment is still required.

$65,000 over five years may sound significant, but it is a drop in the bucket for serious injuries. A year of physiotherapy or a single surgery can eat through those funds. Victims with fractures, brain injuries, or other serious conditions often find themselves cut off from care long before their recovery is complete.

Stricter "Catastrophic" Definition -- Fewer People Qualify for Enhanced Benefits

Not only did the government cut benefit amounts, they also made it harder to qualify as "catastrophically impaired." This category is crucial, because it determines whether a victim can access the higher $1 million benefit limit.

The new rules introduced in 2016 made the tests more complicated, more restrictive, and harder to meet. Straightforward measures like the Glasgow Coma Scale were eliminated, replaced with delayed and technical assessments that can leave victims waiting months just to see if they qualify. Even then, the new criteria are so narrow that many people with devastating injuries still don't meet the threshold.

The result is simple: fewer severely injured people are classified as catastrophic, and more are stuck with the lower $65,000 limit -- far less than they truly need.

No More Courtroom Justice: Victims Forced into the Licence Appeal Tribunal

Perhaps the most damaging change is what happens if an insurer denies benefits. In the past, you could take your insurer to court. Now, that right has been stripped away. Instead, you must file an application at the Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT).

This system is inherently unfair. To even begin, an injured person must pay a $100 fee. They then need to hire a lawyer and pay for medical experts and doctors to prepare reports or testify -- costs that can run into thousands of dollars. Even if the injured person wins their case, they cannot recover these legal costs from the insurance company.

This means the insurance company can wrongly deny a benefit, force the victim through an expensive fight, and even if they lose, the injured person is left with the bill. This flies in the face of natural justice. It discourages people from pursuing legitimate claims and gives insurers a powerful incentive to deny benefits, knowing that many victims will simply give up.

An Unfair Tribunal Biased Toward Insurers

The LAT has proven to be an inhospitable place for accident victims. Over time, the success rate of claimants has plummeted, while insurers routinely prevail. The scales are heavily tilted.

A major concern is the qualifications of LAT adjudicators. Unlike judges, many adjudicators are not lawyers and do not hold law degrees. Yet they are entrusted with interpreting complex medical evidence and deciding whether someone is catastrophically injured. It is alarming that individuals without legal training are making decisions that can devastate a victim's financial future.

Inconsistent rulings, long delays, and questionable decision-making have only added to the perception that the LAT is fundamentally flawed and biased against victims.

Broken Promises: Premiums Stay High While Coverage Gets Gutted

Why did the government make these cuts? Supposedly, to lower auto insurance premiums. Ontarians were promised cheaper rates if benefits were reduced. But those savings never truly materialized. Premiums remain among the highest in Canada, while victims are left with slashed coverage.

Now, the government is considering going further by letting drivers opt out of key benefits like income replacement, caregiver benefits, or even death and funeral benefits. The idea is that you'll pay less in premiums if you give up coverage. But if tragedy strikes, you and your family will be left with nothing.

This approach is reckless. It leaves Ontarians dangerously under-protected while insurers continue to profit.

How You Can Protect Yourself

Until the system changes, the best protection is to buy optional accident benefits to increase your coverage. For only a few hundred dollars a year, you can:

  • Restore catastrophic coverage to $2 million instead of $1 million
  • Increase non-catastrophic limits from $65,000 to $130,000
  • Boost income replacement benefits from $400 per week to $600, $800, or even $1,000 per week
  • Add caregiver, housekeeping, and indexation benefits for broader protection

These small investments can make the difference between surviving financially after an accident or being left without the support you need.

Conclusion: A Broken System, A Call for Change

Ontario's accident benefit system has been gutted, and the LAT has become a one-sided forum that too often fails the very people it was meant to protect. Benefits are lower, qualifying is harder, and justice through the courts has been stripped away. Meanwhile, insurance premiums remain stubbornly high, and the government continues to side with insurers.

Until meaningful reform happens, the most important thing you can do is protect yourself and your family by purchasing additional accident benefits. It's a modest cost for peace of mind and security in the event of a serious accident.

Because when tragedy strikes, you deserve more than a broken system stacked against you -- you deserve real protection.


Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you've been injured in a motor vehicle accident and need help navigating the LAT system, consult with an experienced personal injury lawyer.

Related Articles

NEED A LAWYER?

We are here 24/7 to address your case. You can speak with a lawyer to request a consultation.

905-744-8888

GET STARTED WITH A FREE CONSULTATION

Why Choose UL Lawyers

  • Decades of combined experience
  • Millions recovered for our clients
  • No fee unless we win your case
  • 24/7 client support
  • Personalized legal strategies